social space: modernism as circulation, postmodernism as atomization and rootedness

The central problem for [architect Leon] Krier is that modernist urban planning works mainly though mono-functional zoning.  As a result, circulation of people between zones by way of artificial arteries becomes the central preoccupation of the planner, generating an urban pattern that is, in Krier’s judgement, ‘anti-ecological’ because it is wasteful of time, energy, and land […]

Krier contrasts this situation with the ‘good city’ (by its nature ecological) in which ‘the totality of urban functions’ are provided within ‘compatible and pleasant walking distances.’  Recognizing that such an urban form ‘cannot grow by extension in width and height’ but only ‘through multiplication,’ Krier seeks a city form made up of ‘complete and finite urban communities,’ each constituting an independent urban quarter within  a large family of urban quarters, that in turn make up ‘cities within a city.’

From David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity, Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990, p. 67

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s